Monday, 10 July 2017

Audition requirements


There are many types of audition you may be asked to carry out as a prospective performer.

At a TV or film audition you may be asked to recite a monologue, potentially sing, and reenact a scene from the script. At drama school, you may need to recite a classical monologue, particularly a Shakespeare, sing, dance and take part in a modern monologue or script reading. You would also need to carry out some drama improvisations or games.

For musical theatre shows, you may need to sing, study and then sight read a text, dance, and perhaps take part in an improvisation.

Not all theatre audition pieces, however, are suitable for all types of theatre. If you were doing a classic Shakespeare tv programme, it would be unlikely that you would need to sing, dance or learn contemporary monologues.

If you were doing a 1950s musical, you would probably need to sing, dance and recite part of a script, but you would not need Shakespeare or a very modernised monologue.

This year, I have experienced many different auditions and observed what is required for them. I went to UWTSD in Swansea, where I applied for a university degree in Applied Drama. There, I took part in a very informal interview. Due to the fact that the course is entirely Drama based,we took part in a number of team games, drama workshop exercises, and group activities including creating a small physical theatre piece.


This varied hugely to the the University of Chichester, which took on a slightly wider Spectrum of theatre. We had to memorise two audition monologues, take part in a storytelling project, and worked on some interpretations of contemporary scripts. We also  took part in some drama games and had to devise some small scenes based on stimuli.

Finally, I went to Theatre Brycheiniog with my class where we took part in a very different workshop, where we had to recite our monologues, create physical theatre images, take part in drama games, and  most of all work on longer improvised pieces like the therapy circle and the scenes based on short character descriptions. The feedback that was given was very professional as it geared us up towards a drama school type audition.   

I have had the vocational opportunity of carrying out my audition pieces for this course, but I have also been fortunate enough to have had the opportunities to take part in proper auditions, with professionals who could advise and support my improvements. There are many different vocal and physical stances you can apply to an audition piece. In my modern monologue which I recited at the theatre  the University of Chichester, and in front of a crowd, was an angry role. While playing her, I leaned forward confrontationally as the character was angry with her parents. When she was remembering her childhood, she sighed, and made her voice more emotional and quiet, and her body more defeated and vulnerable. The Shakespeare piece also included a very angry, almost chiding stance, leaning forward as if to confront someone. Her voice was firm and full of stress and irritation based on her personal situation. At Brycheiniog I played an ex prisoner who seemed a bit vague in voice, and closed n stance, and who backed away when she was close to being caught. During the Therapy Circle, I sat calmly and openly, with neatly crossed legs and a mild approachable expression on my face. My voice was quiet but clear, and had a gently authoritative touch so that I could lead the therapy session. When selecting my monologue, I did attempt a different role, that of a young girl who was very flirtatious, and for that I leant forward, as if facing someone, ready to gossip. I inserted a cheeky quality to my voice so that it was clear that she was bold and flirtatious.

My final contemporary piece, from Keeping Tom Nice by Lucy Gannon was a success. I entered the stage by marching down the stairs angrily. I then stood near to the audience to make them feel uncomfortable, and to stress the confrontational stance of my character. My posture was very stiff and angry, and I used slightly mocking hand gestures for phrases like “You smooth the bed” and used a mocking high pitched tone for  “Soapy flannels”.  I also used a very angry tone, and made sure it was emotional, as my character had been badly upset by her parents, and seemed to be venting her opinions after a long time. I knew the script very well as I had to recite it at my interviews and at the theatre workshop day, so I could easily act the part without the need to hesitate, or go off track.

I found the lists, and the older language of Taming Of The Shrew a very difficult challenge. In Katherine’s last monologue she uses a lot of words to define the importance of the husband, and the qualities a wife should have. Due to this, when recording my monologue, I needed prompts and to cut the monologue short so that I could remember it. Despite finding a synopsis and a literal translation for this monologue, it was the complex language and phrasing of the words that hindered me from perfecting this speech.  For this piece also, I stood in a confrontational stance, and almost seemed to scold other young girls for not trying to be equals with her husband. I made the tone slightly disapproving, forceful and also spoke in a way as if I was educating the audience. I did need to be prompted, and I did not have many gestures, apart from on the first line where I firmly stepped forward and started to scold the audience.


Overall, I feel I have used a variety of vocal, facial, and bodily expressions to embellish my audition roles. I am disappointed that I struggled with the classical  piece, as I had a full understanding of the meaning and mood of the monologue, but was let down by the words. However, I feel that I did take on each role, and used my body, and particularly my voice, to add emotion and mood to my audition
 pieces. 

Monday, 3 July 2017

First reading of story

           18 April.  Since the first draft was written, I Started thinking of ways to develop the story Some more  However I found that the story did not flow very well. Here is my first rendition of my story which I performed to my peers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYZrj53nJOs&feature=youtu.be

 They suggested for me to use sound effects, more dynamic tones and expression, and to bring the story to life a bit more by expressing myself through sounds and vocal clarity. The tenses were not accurate, and I found that writing in the first person was harder as there were two characters' point of view. I decided that instead of making alterations I would restart the story. This would mean I could start with a new, fresh draft that I could more easily perform. I will upload this version when it is completed. . However, I found that  I continued to think of new ideas to develop the story.

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

Theatr Brycheiniog workshop


On the 31st January we were invited to go to Theatr Brycheiniog, in Brecon. This theatre serves all the border counties and is the biggest theatre in our area. WE arrived in the morning and were greeted by Martyn Green, CEO. He was to be our practitioner for the day. He had once been an actor but eventually went into stage management and then management. He was very well versed in theatre and had offered us the opportunity of going to the theatre to work both in the studio and on the Main Stage.In the morning, he showed us around the theatre, talking about his development plans for it. After that we performed our contemporary monologues for the Auditions for Actors unit.

After lunch, we performed a series of improvisations on the main stage for Martyn who gave us a constructive critique at the end of each improvisation. It really was a new experience actually performing improvisation to a professional theatre practitioner and it really made me raise my game. I tried to apply the teachings of Grotowski, Artaud and Stanislavski where appropriate. I also gave thought to movement, gesture, projection, mime and most importantly,characterisation as, at all times, I wanted to create believable scenarios and characters.
We started off with a few warm up activities including physical theatre pieces where we had to create shapes like a motorbike, a creature, a four poster bed and an elephant.

https://youtu.be/xQo5beK9EKU

https://youtu.be/gWWwLLGyaGQ

https://youtu.be/ifxsIVxxrn4

THis is footage of our character development scenario.

https://youtu.be/SkThtlGaGRM

Extending improvisation

https://youtu.be/upRThYmzNfU

Stimulus - Difficult customers in a restaurant

In this improvisation we were required to develop a scenario. The strength of the story line  needed to be driven by maintaining our characters. The objective was to create an engaging story line by  working in the style of Mike Leigh, the director. He creates plays by bringing actors together and getting them to improvise around a theme. This can produce really dynamic results as he  carefully considers the cast before he introduces them.Their improvisations feed directly into the script he produces.
Feedback:
Feedback we received was that we weren't 'difficult' enough. It was all delivered on one level and there was no defined beginning, middle or end.The only element of dynamism was right at the end when we stormed off. I smiled when we stormed off which meant I was fully engaged with my character. We were commended for our naturalism, this would work in a t.v drama.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tPBNHwB-TI

Stimulus -Fairytale

We were asked to re- create Cinderella with just the five of us. We were also given the task of doing it in the style of a soap opera. . However, we hadn't included any of the type of features you would expect to see in a soap.
This was a good experience for me as I had to multi - role as none else volunteered to take roles as the improvisation developed. I played a male role and an angry and unpleasant role. I tried to maintain each individual character by applying emotional memory in the style of Stanislavski. As a man, I had to dance with Angel so I tried to use a deeper voice as well.

Feedback:
Feedback I personally received was that I was spontaneous and seized opportunities as and when they presented themselves. Group feedback was that we had committed to following the original storyline and  that we had produced an entertaining and developed scenario. A constructive criticism was that we hadn't created a soap opera style of drama. For that, we could have raised the level of 'drama' and possibly by over-reacting to incidents or by slightly changing the story to include more contemporary elements.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64GG7uAz0qs&feature=youtu.be

Stimulus - All change!

In this improv, we had to start the scenario off with two of us, then the third person comes in and changes whatever dynamic we have established. When Mikey came in and affected the atmosphere, Emily and I had to respond to this in a believable way. I was able to stay in character, despite the drastic change of pace and emotion.
Feedback:
We were told we had created a 'kitchen sink drama'. These became popular in the 1960's and involved a naturalistic acting style and often dealt with disturbing or emotional themes. We were told we sustained our characters successfully and we responded sensitively to each other.

https://youtu.be/QU2zzd4EXH8

Stimulus - Role Swap

This improvisation involved swapping roles mid way through the piece. In this improvisation I started off in the first couple so I had to carefully examine the role I was playing so that it could be easily replicated by the person that took my role over.We responded to feedback which was to observe more closely each others intonation and tone patterns, as,whilst we got the movement, the actual tone of the improvisation changed with the new couple coming in.  So, we had another go with the focus on intonation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipFIif2jbgg&t=99s

Stumulus _ Role Swap
Our second attempt at this stimulus. This time we really used listening skills to try to take on the vocal tone and intonation patterns of the person whose character we were taking over.. My aim was to make sure that any one who copied me, could easily mimic my voice and body language.

Feedback we received was that this second improvisation was better, in terms of us assimilating the original characters.

Simple improvs+ weekly reflections

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2hPp7Gux7s&feature=youtu.be

In this solo improvisation, I explored the space and used mime. I had to express my emotions through muttered speech and clear movement and gesture.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOAhyeSht_I&feature=youtu.be

This was a solo improvisation in which I was driving and I shouted at the Sat Nav to shut up. I tried to understand the role of someone who was impatient and someone was late- but it wasn't their fault.  I learned that when you are carrying out a solo improvisation and it's up to you to engage the audience. If you falter, it means you're not in character.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSjna2Nv5U0


In this improvisation our group had a disagreement. The blame changed to different people and the emotion changed frequently. Our feedback was that we worked together as a team and were able to switch the emotion well.

https://youtu.be/w0jKHRKyxqc


Callum and I were doing a pairs improvisation. We were really having to listen to each other so that the scene flowed.

11 September. We looked at quite basic improv work this week. In our small groups, we had some very little scenarios to look at. We did an exercise where one person left the room and in a pair, we made a scenario based on an emotion, and the person who left had to guess what the word or emotion was. We had a funeral, a therapy session, and a patient anxious for test results. This helped us to look at  what we were trying to convey, and how the audience would feel in response. On THURSDAY, we did scenarios in pairs as there were 5 of us. These pieces were contrasting. Fair example, one person wanted a pet, the other didn't. There were family scenes, friendship ones and school scenes. It really helped to work with a range of people, with different acting styles.I researched Mike Leigh and looked at his work on youtube. He is a very talented director. His actors are fantastic as they work in a team, without corpsing, and with the ability to devise scenes based on anything.   18 September. This week, we continued doing little scenes. We worked in a small group of 3, creating scenarios based on conversations or relevant group ideas. Callum discussed  the Mary Rose, so we made a scene about that, with a tour guide, a mother and a bored child. We also did a dispute improv, with a problem of different people wanting to watch different things at a cinema. We also worked on a difficult restraunt customers with conflicting problems. We also did a guessing game where we had to assign someone a character, or real person, and make them guess and imagine themselves in their shoc, in order to work out who was chosen for them. This was quite hard as the spectrum of types of character or real person are so broad.    25 September. This week we were introduced to solo improvs. This was where we focussed on one actor, with a scenario. Mina was a person none alone, hearing a sound at the door, and panicking as it was from the kitchen. My first attempt was with lots of speech, and my second had none. I found that without any speech, I found it hard at to portray what I wanted to, however, apparently my expression and movement was better that way. Too much speech took away from that. In future, I will try to use my body more, and speech a little less, but using a fair mixture. We were introduced to one line improv. We were given a line and one of us had to use it at first, launching in to an improv. WE worked together well on this, as the improv sparked from the line, and we worked together while put on the spot. We needed to be spontaneous and dynamic.   2 October. This week, we advanced the one liners, by only one person knowing what it would be. This stopped us from overthinking, or being able to plan much storyline. We also looked at people in a place with a problem, as this was a basic improv technique that helps you define characters, context and issue for a piece.   14 October. This week we worked on one line improv, in a group of 4. This is very different as this exercise began in a pair, and was increased to 4 people. We also looked at particular scenarios, like people on the edge of  a cliff. We had a couple of seconds to plan, but then we began. The topic was so broad that it could lead anywhere, and it actually traveled down the suicide path, and it was interesting for me to put myself in the shoes of some one trying to put a stop to a mass suicide.  
3 November    Today we devised and led a workshop where we taught basic improv games to some delegates who had come to the college to learn about working with V.I people. We taught Da Da Diddly, and Fortunately Unfortunately, also What Happened to Maria. They seemed interested and had a few questions about the course for us.   We then worked in a group to do a restauraunt improv. This improvisation focused on using mime skills.We each had a character trait to impersonate. Mine was a newly redundant character. We had five minutes planning time before starting. We then realised we'd been overthinking so we began. We got our timings  well, and worked together well. We then worked in pairs with doctor patient improvs. It helped us to work together, with enough room for dialogue. We also learnt how each other worked. It was good to work with Charlotte and Angel, as I had not worked with them much before.
As part of our Auditions for Actors unit, we used improvisation to learn more about our monologue characters. I found this a particularly useful exercise as it enabled me to make more of a connection to Charlie from 'Keepig Tom Nice' Below is some footage from this activity.

https://youtu.be/P_lpyYCCauI

https://youtu.be/wJKZ9Mzns5U

Tuesday, 27 June 2017

Contrasting monologues

I think my monologues contrasted well. My contemporary character Charlie, from 'Keeping Tom Nice' was confrontational to her parents and was obviously holding in a lot of pent up emotion. There was a lot of scope within this piece to explore anger and sadness and I really enjoyed the challenge of working with these emotions and creating a believable character.

My second monologue came from 'Taming of the Shrew', I was playing the character Katherine. She is confident, outspoken, loud and feisty and quite aggressive with her female counterparts. But she has realised that the way to be with your husband is to support him and not go against him as, ultimately, it will make their life experience so much better if they are living harmoniously.


Here is my final monologue.

https://youtu.be/7Lj2RCMuy0Y

Here is my final taming of the shrew monologue:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNdiP3_6gkg&feature=youtu.be

melodic phrases

Below is a link to my youtube account where there is a video of me carrying out my melodic phrases.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC8ccd1H6ZI